Home Home Contact Us Help Registering and Participating Disclaimer Please Note: THIS FORUM IS PATIENT MODERATED AND IS NOT CONNECTED TO ANY CLINIC OR DOCTOR. IF YOU WISH TO CONTACT A CERTAIN DOCTOR OR CLINIC, PLEASE LOOK IN THE ASK THE DOCTOR SECTION FOR DOCTOR OR CLINIC PHONE NUMBERS AND EMAIL ADDRESSES.

                       Home || Contact Us || Help Registering and Participating || Disclaimer

Unlock Secrets in Your Own DNA with 23andMe.com

Nutri-Health Products

 Buy 1 Get 1 Free at Puritan's Pride

LivLong – The Ultimate Anti-aging Product

SeaChange Partners with Life Extension Products

 

Barbara and Jeannine's Book

Bea Luis Memorial

 

Join the ICMS


Go Back   Stem Cell Pioneers > Press Releases - News Stories > Legislation - Regulation
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2012, 01:52 PM
barbara barbara is offline
Pioneer Founding member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,883
Blog Entries: 5
Default FDA drug review proposal draws critics at BIO Convention

LIFE SCIENCES
Boston.com
06/18/2012


By Robert Weisman, Globe Staff

As more than 15,000 life sciences professional converged on Boston Monday for the Biotechnology Organization’s annual convention, a Food and Drug Administration plan to make regulatory decisions on new drugs more transparent drew criticism from some industry members.

“For my money, this is kindergarten,” groused Vladimir Shnaydman, president of Orbee Consulting, an Ashland firm that advises life sciences companies. “They move too slowly, and this is very disappointing.”

The goal of the FDA’s proposed “benefit-risk framework,” which has been in the works since 2009, is to improve the consistency of the agency’s review criteria for new drug candidates and make them easier to communicate, said Patrick J. Frey, director of planning and analysis at the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

Under the proposed criteria, FDA reviewers would describe a medical condition and its clinical manifestations, list other therapies used to treat it, assess effectiveness and safety, and compare them with the experimental drug.

Frey said the FDA currently has no formal benefit-risk format.

“Oftentimes, the table can be littered with benefit-risk considerations,” he said. “But when you boil them down, this is what really matters.”

Shnaydman and others called on the FDA to make more quantitative decisions on drug candidates, arguing that data-driven decisions are common in other industries.

But while FDA regulators are willing to quantify the “magnitude of risks and benefits,” Frey said, “ultimately, it’s a qualitative assessment.”

Brian G. Atwood, managing director of Versant Ventures in Menlo Park, Calif., said the FDA criteria should be simple enough to communicate to members of Congress and the media who, he said, can derail new drugs by focusing on safety problems.

“Bomb throwers and the media really hurt the industry,” Atwood said. “You need to find some way to immunize the industry.”

Robert Weisman can be reached at weisman@globe.com.
__________________
First treatment in 2007. Pioneering ever since.

Barbara
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright 2007 - 2011 Stem Cell Pioneers


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Stem Cell Pioneers