PDA

View Full Version : Pioneering stem cell bandage receives approval for clinical trial


barbara
06-05-2011, 07:38 PM
June 5, 2011


Millions of people with knee injuries could benefit from a new type of stem cell bandage treatment if clinical trials are successful. The world's first clinical trial for the treatment of patients with torn meniscal cartilage has received approval from the UK regulatory agency, the MHRA1, to commence.

The current treatment for the majority of tears is the removal of the meniscus, a procedure that often results in the early onset of osteoarthritis.
The Phase I trial, one of the first in the UK to be approved using stem cells, will treat meniscal tear patients with a cell bandage product, seeded with the patient's own, expanded, stem cells.
The cell bandage, produced by Azellon Ltd, a University of Bristol spin-out company, is focused on the research, development and commercialisation of an adult autologous (patient's own) stem cell technology which in vitro (tissue culture) has shown great promise for the healing of meniscal tears.
The trial is designed primarily to test the safety profile of Azellon's cell bandage in ten meniscal tear patients, but some information on whether or not it works will also be obtained. The bandage, containing the patient's own stem cells will be implanted in a simple surgical procedure using a specially designed instrument that helps to deliver the cells into the injured site as a first-line treatment in place of removal of the meniscus. Patients will be closely monitored for safety over a five-year follow-up period.
Professor Anthony Hollander, Chief Scientific Officer at Azellon Ltd and Head of the School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine at the University of Bristol, said: "The approval we have received from the MHRA is an important milestone in the development of stem cell therapies in the UK. These cells hold much scientific and medical promise but we can only know if they work or not by testing them out in clinical trials."
Professor Ashley Blom, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Bristol, added: "The effective repair of meniscal tears would represent a significant advance in treatment, particularly for younger patients and athletes by reducing the likelihood of early onset osteoarthritis, and would offer an exciting new treatment option for surgeons."
More than 900,000 patients have meniscal tears every year in Europe with perhaps 800,000 to one million meniscal repairs in US making the total market 1.7 million meniscal tears per year. Seven per cent of meniscal surgeries are repairs in the 'red' zone, the rest (1,581,000 tears) remain total or partial menisectomies. Meniscus tears normally occur in active and younger people (estimated 80 per cent of meniscal patients are younger than 50). Meniscus tear is a common sports injury and is especially prevalent amongst competitive athletes in football (including US and Australian rules), rugby and basketball. Patients who have partial or total menisectomy have an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis over the following 4.5 to eight years.
Provided by University of Bristol

LLL6521
06-06-2011, 01:37 PM
Gee, another effective stem cell treatment being done overseas. It sounds similar to the Regennex treatments that was challenged by the FDA as a "drug." Between FDA restrictions and legal challenges for funding, the U.S. has become a broken down car on the side of the road. Meanwhile, other countries are speeding by leaving us in the dust.

Jeannine
06-06-2011, 04:49 PM
Isn't that the truth?

I checked out the stem cell research being done in California with $3 Billion of CA taxpayer dollars and there were around 300 projects going on.

http://www.cirm.ca.gov/Grant_overview_charts

Not even ONE for lungs. However, there are several stem cells trials going on in China for COPD.

Most of the money is going to embryonic research. Have you heard of any breakthroughs? Seems to me the only stem cells showing any promise are adult stem cells and the breakthroughs are being conducted by private companies. CA only handed money to non-profits as if they're REALLY non-profits? LOL

barbara
06-08-2011, 02:19 PM
Dr. Geeta Shroff has been using embryonic stem cell therapy for her patients for many years. She treats in India. She hosted Ask the Doctor a while back. Her session is archived in the Ask the Doctor section. I think there is merit and research to back up some of the claims, but there is also more to it than simply stating that esc's cause tumors. If the stem cells are not processed properly, I think there could be an argument for that. I also think there is an argument for what you have stated - endless research. It is interesting that a few clinical trials using esc's have been given the green light by the FDA. Why would this be if they cause tumors to the extent that we have been led to believe?

LLL6521
06-09-2011, 06:52 AM
Barbara,

Yesterday, I posted a comment and pulled it, because I did not want to sound as if I was promoting embryonic stem cells. I basically questioned the veracity of all claims that esc’s produce tumors. I guess the only reason I question it, because prominent research facilities like Duke have claimed that donated UCB treatments can be deadly, and that is far from the truth. Secondly, when you search in the web for evidence on producing tumors, you mostly get right to life and religious organizations claiming its dangers. If you search further in the web, you find very little on the topic as far as legitimate abstracts or research on it. The only article I found was the one on macular degeneration treatments with embryonic stem cells (FDA approved clinical trial). It mentions how they managed to control the proliferation of esc’s from forming tumors. Then again, India has been performing treatments with esc’s with no adverse affects, so if India has found a way to process them and control their proliferation, U.S. just reports the dangers with no solutions. Hmm, could it be another way to delay treatments to buy more time for research funding and allowing big pharma to sell more drugs to conditions that can potentially be curable by esc treatments??? It is funny how most have accepted the claim that esc’s are dangerous as fact or gospel. The "powers that be" have decided to delay it by disseminating false claims. This is just my opinion.

Jeannine
06-09-2011, 11:56 AM
LLL

U.S. just reports the dangers with no solutions. Hmm, could it be another way to delay treatments to buy more time for research funding and allowing big pharma to sell more drugs to conditions that can potentially be curable by esc treatments??? It is funny how most have accepted the claim that esc’s are dangerous as fact or gospel. The "powers that be" have decided to delay it by disseminating false claims. This is just my opinion.

That's pretty much where I stand as well. The old saying "if you repeat something long enough it becomes fact" I believe applies to ESC as well.

Mary-Anne
06-10-2011, 07:02 AM
Yeah, I agree. We yet have to find out about the risks and dangers with time - but I don't think it will be too dramatic. I mean, the critis sometimes say it like normal drugs (drugs approved by the FDA!) are completely harmelss - which they are definitely not. So there's always a downside, but I think we shouldn't condemn this research too soon. I believe ALL stem cells have a great potential. Time will tell what cells are better for what disease, but therapies will come. I'm sure of it.